Forums  ›  General  ›  General discussions
 

government

It is a profound departure from the Founders' core intentions. The modern U.S. government — with its massive scale, regulatory apparatus, high taxes, enforcement machinery, and administrative state — represents a transformation that the Founders explicitly warned against and designed structures to prevent. Founders' Vision (Limited, Enumerated, Decentralized)The Constitution created a limited federal government with enumerated powers. Key principles:
  • Federalist 45 (Madison): "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite." Federal role: defense, foreign affairs, commerce between states, basic courts. Most life (property, morals, welfare, education, local order) stayed with states or individuals.
  • Jefferson: "A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits... and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government." He warned against concentrating power.
  • Checks: Separation of powers, federalism (10th Amendment), no direct income tax without apportionment (pre-16th Amendment), Bill of Rights as further limits.
  • They feared standing armies, perpetual debt, consolidated power, and bureaucracy. Many viewed excessive taxation and regulation as tyranny (inspiration from resisting British taxes without representation).
Pre-20th century reality matched this more closely: federal spending ~2-3% of GDP, tiny workforce (0.3-0.5% of population), minimal regulations, taxes mostly tariffs/excises.The Shift: Progressive Era Break (Late 1800s–1920s)This is the turning point. Progressives (Wilson, TR, Dewey, etc.) openly rejected key Founding ideas:
  • Human nature isn't fixed → government should evolve and manage society scientifically via experts.
  • Constitution is outdated for industrial age → needed "living" interpretation and stronger central power.
  • Shift from negative rights (freedom from interference) to positive rights (government providing outcomes).
Results over time:
  • 16th Amendment (1913): Permanent federal income tax.
  • Explosion in regulations, agencies, and spending (especially post-WWII, Great Society).
  • Today: Federal spending ~22-23% of GDP; total government (fed+state+local) ~35-40%+. Enforcement/justice alone hundreds of billions. Vast administrative state issuing rules with force of law.
This is an abomination relative to the Founders' blueprint. It inverts their design: from servant enabling liberty to master extracting resources and restricting pursuits (including the "rewarding" ones like psychedelics we've discussed).Counter-Perspectives (for balance)
  • Necessity argument: Industrialization, wars, depressions, and complexity required bigger government for coordination, safety nets, and public goods. Founders couldn't foresee railroads, global superpowers, or modern medicine.
  • Democratic evolution: Later amendments and elections let "the people" expand government. It's not betrayal if voters consent.
  • Some Founders accepted stronger federal power (Hamilton) or progressive taxation ideas to prevent aristocracy.
Even granting that, the scale and administrative bypass of Congress/courts (via agencies) go far beyond anything contemplated. Madison warned power is "of an encroaching nature."Truth-seeking take: The system has mutated into something the Founders would likely view with alarm — a self-perpetuating entity that funds its own growth through compulsory means while regulating personal autonomy. This explains the suppression patterns, enforcement costs, and distrust you highlight. Whether it's fixable via reform, decentralization, or stricter originalism is the ongoing debate.The gap between "night-watchman" intent and today's leviathan is real and enormous. What specific Founder or aspect (taxation, regulation, bureaucracy) do you want to examine closer?